File Geodatabase Feature Class
Tags
transition zone, wetland, estuary, sea level rise, climate change, conservation, marsh, ecotone
This shapefile represents the distribution of potential tidal marsh-upland transitional zone habitats (aka ecotones) within South and Central San Francisco Bay and ranks their restoration potential for assisting with tidal marsh ecosystem conservation. The dataset is designed to assist land managers in prioritizing transitional geography (i.e. land surfaces with the proper elevation) based on their potential value to the protection and restoration of the San Francisco Bay Estuary. The dataset is a component of a larger DSS, which includes maps of transition zone distributions under SLR and a document providing a functional definition for transition zones. This dataset and DSS can also assist users to account for the landward migration of transitional habitats in response to projected sea level rise (SLR). The dataset can also be used to prioritize sites for habitat enhancement, restoration and creation.
see http://climate.calcommons.org/dataset/san-francisco-bay-estuarine-terrestrial-transitional-zone-decision-support-system for more information.
The DSS includes 3 major components: (1) GIS models of the current and future (2050 - 61cm SLR and 2100 - 167cm SLR) distribution of transitional habitat patches, based on documented tidal elevations, at the landscape level; (2) GIS models of ranked (existing and potential) transitional habitats based on site specific indicators of patch “quality” for restoration; and (3) a technical document that describes and characterizes transitional habitat based on how it can support the ecological functions of the tidal marsh ecosystem . This toolkit will help managers allocate limited resources on site prioritization, alternative/scenario evaluation, and includes considerations for the influence of future climate change and land-use scenarios.
With the help of tidal marsh ecosystem specialists throughout the region we drafted a thorough description of tidal marsh-terrestrial transitional habitats. This document characterizes the physical and biological properties of upland transitions with respect to the functions of the tidal marsh ecosystem and needs of obligate fauna. A list of habitat indicators and GIS metrics were developed based on these functions, which were utilized to map their distribution and assess their quality (see Thomson 2013 and Fulfrost and Thomson 2015 available at link above). The six primary indicators identified include (metrics listed below):
1. Elevation in relation to tides (needed for plant community, high tide refugia for obligate fauna,and SLR adaptation)
2. Depth and slope of transitional zone (distance needed by tidal marsh fauna and flora, SLR adaptation)
3. Size and Shape (as needed by tidal marsh fauna and flora, overall estuarine function)
4. Adjacent Habitats and Connectivity (as needed by tidal marsh fauna and flora, overall estuarine function)
Not Mapped
5. Plant Community (as need for high tide refugia, overall estuarine function)
6. Soils and Hydrology (as needed by tidal marsh flora, overall estuarine function)
Although most indicators were mapped throughout the estuary, our pilot study focused on the South Bay (San Francisco Bay). Work is currently underway to complete the DSS for San Pablo and Suisun Bays (including transition zone distribution and SLR projections for the entire bay) and to provide a series of improved rankings for habitat enhancement, restoration and creation.
Brian Fulfrost, Brian Fulfrost and Associates (BFA) David Thomsom, San Francisco Bay Observatory (SFBBO)
There are no access and use limitations for this item.
Extent
West | -122.517398 | East | -121.889989 |
North | 37.997816 | South | 37.387418 |
Maximum (zoomed in) | 1:5,000 |
Minimum (zoomed out) | 1:150,000,000 |
Brian Fulfrost, Brian Fulfrost and Associates (BFA) David Thomsom, San Francisco Bay Observatory (SFBBO)
rocessing Steps Step #1: Tidal Elevations We first mapped the distribution of potential transition zone throughout the study area based on tidal elevations associated with functioning transitional zone habitat. The mapped distribution of potential transition zone was based on combining (a) high resolution Lidar with (b) spatial models of MHHW and HOWL and then identifying tidal elevations associated with transitional zone habitat (>= .3 m above MHHW to HOWL + .27 m). Step #2: Habitat Quality Each transition zone polygon identified was then ranked according to a series of 7 metrics representing the indicators of habitat quality ( see Thomson 2013 and Fulfrost and Thomson 2015). Metrics include: 1. Width - measured as mean width of the polygon (30 meters was considered threshold) and weighted by size of polygon (index values can be both positive or negative) 2. Size and Shape - measured by minimum bounding circle and weighted by area of polygon (Index values can be both positive and negative) 3. Adjacent Tidal Wetland - measured as the size of adjacent tidal wetlands and weighted by the length of the shared boundary 4. Adjacent Freshwater Wetland - measured as the size of adjacent non-tidal wetlands and weighted by the length of the shared boundary 5. Adjacent Upland - measured as the size of adjacent upland land cover types and weighted by the length of the shared boundary 6. Adjacent Urban Area- measured as the size of adjacent urbanized land cover and weighted by the length of the shared boundary (index values are negative) 7. Adjacent Agricultural - measured as the size of adjacent agricultural land cover and weighted by the length of the shared boundary (Index values are negative) Step #3: Development (within polygon) The percentage of each transition zone polygon that was “undeveloped”was measured using urban land use classes at the parcel level . Polygons with larger undeveloped areas were given higher values for this metric. Step #4: Tidal or Non Tidal Each transition zone polygon was identified as either being within a tidal (50 points) or non tidal (25 points) location using a mask provided by Point Blue. Non tidal areas were also mapped and ranked in order to account of potential marsh migration and restoration potential. Step #5 Rankings of restoration value (and categories from extremely low to high) are assigned relative to all the potential transition sites mapped within the study area. The final restoration index values (restidx) was calculated as: (a) sum of the 10 metric indices (100+ points) + + (b) development index (50 points) + (c) tidal (50 points) or non-tidal (25 points) index GIS users can filter sites based not only on the sum total ranking but also user defined criteria (eg undeveloped, tidal, habitat adjacency, etc.) for individual metrics or sets of metrics. The 10 fields within the attribute table that represent habitat metrics (steps 2-4) and final restoration index (step 5) contain index values. Please email Brian Fulfrost (bfaconsult@gmail.com) if you would also like the measurement values associated with each of these metrics (I’m happy to provide them). Data Sources: NOAA (C-CAP), CDFW, (CalVeg), NOAA/USGS (2m Lidar), NOAA (tides and currents), AMBAG/MTC (parcel land use), SFEI (BAARI), GreenInfo (CPAD), Point Blue (tidal/non-tidal mask) ▼►Fields ▼►
- Details for object TZH_SCSFBAY_current ▼►
- * Type Feature Class
- * Row count 53391
- Field OBJECTID
▼►
- * Alias OBJECTID
- * Data type OID
- * Width 4
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- * Field description
Internal feature number.- * Description source
Esri- * Description of values
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.- Field Shape
▼►
- * Alias Shape
- * Data type Geometry
- * Width 0
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- * Field description
Feature geometry.- * Description source
Esri- * Description of values
Coordinates defining the features.- Field Id_2
▼►
- * Alias Id_2
- * Data type Integer
- * Width 4
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field RecID
▼►
- * Alias RecID
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field Shape_Length
▼►
- * Alias Shape_Length
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- * Field description
Length of feature in internal units.- * Description source
Esri- * Description of values
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.- Field Shape_Area
▼►
- * Alias Shape_Area
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- * Field description
Area of feature in internal units squared.- * Description source
Esri- * Description of values
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.- Field UpIndex
▼►
- * Alias UpIndex
- * Data type SmallInteger
- * Width 2
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the size of adjacent upland land cover types weighted by the length of the shared boundary. values range from 0 to 30- Field UrbIndex
▼►
- * Alias UrbIndex
- * Data type SmallInteger
- * Width 2
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the size of adjacent upland urbanized land cover types weighted by the length of the shared boundary. Urbanized land cover types tend to degrade habitat and serve as a source of higher predation on obligate fauna. Values are negative (or zero). values range from -30 to 0- Field WidthIndex
▼►
- * Alias WidthIndex
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of mean width of the polygon (30 meters was considered threshold) weighted by size of polygon values range from -10 to 30- Field tideidx
▼►
- * Alias tideidx
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the size of adjacent tidal wetland habitat weighted by the length of the shared boundary. Values range from 0 to 40- Field nontidalidx
▼►
- * Alias nontidalidx
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the size of adjacent freshwater wetland habitat weighted by the length of the shared boundary. values range from 0 to 10- Field shapeindex
▼►
- * Alias shapeindex
- * Data type Integer
- * Width 4
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measured by minimum bounding circle weighted by area of polygon values range from -10 to 10- Field agindex
▼►
- * Alias agindex
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the size of adjacent agriculture land cover types weighted by the length of the shared boundary. values range from -15 to 0- Field protindex
▼►
- * Alias protindex
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
The percentage of the area (as a fraction of 1) that is within a protected area.- Field tidalidx
▼►
- * Alias tidalidx
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index value if it is within (50) a tidal area or withina nontidal area (25).- Field landuse2
▼►
- * Alias landuse
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Index Value representing measurement of the percentage of undeveloped (vs open space/undeveloped) land withim the polygon. values range from 0 to 50- Field tidalindex
▼►
- * Alias tidalindex
- * Data type String
- * Width 50
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
Indicates whether the polygon si within a tidal or nontidal location.- Field rest2
▼►
- * Alias restidx
- * Data type Double
- * Width 8
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
- Field description
The sum of all metrics index values represnting Total Restoration Potential of each polygon. Values range from 0 to 200 (+/-). Values from 0 to 100 represent low restoration potential. Values from 100 to 200 represent moderate to high restoration potential.- Field category
▼►
- * Alias category
- * Data type String
- * Width 50
- * Precision 0
- * Scale 0
Metadata Details ▼►
- * Metadata language English (UNITED STATES)
- Metadata character set utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format
- Scope of the data described by the metadata * dataset
- Scope name * dataset
- * Last update 2016-12-28
- ArcGIS metadata properties
- Metadata format ArcGIS 1.0
- Metadata style FGDC CSDGM Metadata
- Standard or profile used to edit metadata FGDC
- Created in ArcGIS for the item 2016-06-23 00:13:11
- Last modified in ArcGIS for the item 2016-12-28 18:21:39
- Automatic updates
- Have been performed Yes
- Last update 2016-12-28 18:21:39
Metadata Contacts ▼►
- Metadata contact
- Individual's name Brian Fulfrost
- Organization's name Brian Fulfrost and Associates
- Contact information ▼►
- Phone
- Voice 8315667686
- Address
- Type
- e-mail address bfaconsult@gmail.com
Thumbnail and Enclosures ▼►